🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious although failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of ballots that came in later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible in which election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year backed Zohran now. But it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could go over two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I think that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.