🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a pending law that include decreasing the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during broader worries about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Last month, international health experts sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of corporate influence globally. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be decreased to less than half “following international suggested parameters”, delayed for at least 12 months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a warning should cover at least half of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, arguing that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for multiple violations “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the company is dedicated to ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but claims that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures operated within the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We exist in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and gather the crop and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative stated: “The company operates its operations according with current country statutes. Moreover, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which enable interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, adding that underage people should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We support developing rules to accomplish desired public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which involves growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.