🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is seeking damages totaling $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This move is a clear response by the Kremlin regarding plans to use immobilized Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on reports in Russian state media, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will determine later this week regarding a proposal to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and financial stability.

The vast majority of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

EU officials have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU countries following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has labeled any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has warned of retaliatory measures, including confiscating European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a key role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a vicious assault on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is facing over 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While courts in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, if relevant holdings can be identified," commented a legal expert from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials indicated they are working on measures to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. They are also crafting safeguards to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would stay unaffected.

Ukraine would solely be obligated to repay the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense damage caused during the ongoing conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative method for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also significant," she stated. "It also delivers a powerful signal that if you do all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."